Welcome!

In the forum on this page you can see IELTS essays by people just like you. Hundreds of people added essays and comments and helped each other to get a great IELTS essay score! Have a look at their amazing writing!

Please note: This forum is closed!

closed

Sorry! However, please enjoy the hundreds of essays and thousands of comments still available here. A HUGE thanks to all the writers who commented and to all the visitors. We hope we've made IELTS writing less scary.

Popular Tags

Click the links below to see essays on that topic.

art business communication children crime culture economy education environment families food freedom globalization
health heritage  leisure media politics science society sports television travel technology transport university violence work

Avatar

Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_Related Related Topics sp_TopicIcon
Should more money be spent on teaching science?
Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
June 9, 2012
2:06 pm
Avatar
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3
Member Since:
June 9, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Most of the government funding should be used by schools to teach science rather than teach other subjects in order for a country to develop. To what extent do you agree or disagree?


Due to the limited government funding, we should get the most use of it in the right way. On top of it, having a well-designed plan in what should be taught in schools plays an essential role in the success of education.

 

Science, including physics, chemistry, biology etc., is undoubtedly the driving force of the development of modern society. Without the advancement in science, we would have no convenient public transportation, cheap electronic devices and informative internet. Therefore, the statement that government should invest most of their funding in the education of science is true to some extent for the reason that the cultivation of talents is the foundation on which science could be developed.

 

Nevertheless, I would argue that, the investment in other subjects, such as literature, law and art, is equally important the development of society. The advancement in science is not the only factor that promotes the development of society. People, who pay too much attention to the teaching of science, neglect the importance of other factors which may be more vitally important for a country to develop. For instance, people’s sense of responsibilities, people’s feeling of happiness both have significant influence on the energy and time people devote to their work. Generally, people who are well-educated by schools in the subject of literature or art tend to enjoy their lives better and hence have higher efficiency when working. Besides, nothing seems more indispensable than the power of law to the development of modern society. For example, without the protection of intelligent property by law, government could not give enough encouragement to inventors and scientists.

 

To conclude, government funding cannot be allocated mainly on the teaching of science, and it should be used by schools to teach other subjects which are equally important. 


Forum Timezone: Asia/Dubai

Most Users Ever Online: 299

Currently Online:
7 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1

Members: 172

Moderators: 1

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 3

Topics: 545

Posts: 2204

Moderators: Newestadmin: 0

Top
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!