thanks for you correction! you know what.
Its really helpful, I think I should consider my essay after I finish it, because it may seems weird sometimes.
By the way, your rewrite ones is exquisite that is one I try to make it!
and here is my rewrite:
Before the world became technical and modern, the government and scientist had explored the natural resources and exploited the property in order to better people’s life. After nearly exhausting the natural resources, the government tends to increase the price of fuel to help the environment. However, I feel that is not the best way to preserve the Earth. In this essay, I will indicate for several reasons why I disagree with this opinion.
In this cutting-edge world, human beings are suffering from the artificial disaster and calamity, such as global warming and resource exhausting etc. The government provides some irreversible policies to solve the problems. For example, boost the price of taxes, fuel, routine diet and everything resources in the market. After implementing, it is not helpful, but even worse.
More exactly, I am absolutely disagreeing that the priority is to make life to be more difficult instead of helping the world consciously. For instance, the government did not realize that the number of the demands in the world is way more than the numbers of resources we have nowadays, so I think the policy should act wisely. Secondly, boosting the price of routine diet is only makes people hard to stay alive, but also force them to live in under the poor line. Form the last point of view, I think that the government and scientist can cultivate a new technical system to create numerous new bio-fuels and genetically modified food for people using instead of wasting more and more resources.
To conclude, personally, I believe that the policy should not only focus on the problem itself, but also find out some solution to compensate shortage of ideas. The famous scientist Albert Einstein have said, “the greatest danger in modern technology is not begin to think like people, but that people to think like machine”.