Hi Allen and welcome to Writefix!
I hope you can help some of the other people in this forum. Your writing seems to be clear and organized. But there's a problem with this essay....
Shorten/Simplify
You wrote:
People from dissimilar backgrounds may have divergent attitudes toward the same issue with respect to the value of the old and the youth respectively
What dissimilar backgrounds? Do you mean old and young, or rich and poor, or working and unemployed, or Korean and Brazilian?
And what does ‘respectively’ mean?
And what does ‘the same issue’ mean or refer to?
Don’t use ‘respectively’: it forces the reader to stop and go back to see what is being referred to.
Don’t use any tired standardized generic phrases or phrases that could be used in a million essays. (You can see examples here and here. Avoid these phrases!). Here’s one:
In my opinion, both of them have their own merits.
What does ‘them’ refer to? The people from dissimilar backgrounds (that’s the subject in the first sentence, so grammatically that’s what it refers to). Or do you mean ‘Both old and young people have their merits’?
Let’s simplify right down:
You wrote:
People from dissimilar backgrounds may have divergent attitudes toward the same issue with respect to the value of the old and the youth respectively
Here’s one possible rewrite. The last sentence (the thesis sentence) tells the reader something about what is coming in the essay. You can read more about Thesis sentences here.
Old and young people have a lot to contribute to society. In this essay, I will look at how the wisdom and experience of age and the dynamism and adaptability of youth can complement each other.
Layout
Once we get past the introduction, the layout of your other paragraphs is fine. The body paragraphs have a topic and two or three ideas and examples. Your conclusion has an opinion, a summary, and a look towards the future. So, so far, the main problem is with your very generic and empty introduction
But have you noticed the big problem yet?
Big Problem: Question Not Answered!
You have not answered the question. Here it is again.
In some cultures elderly people are highly valued, while in some other cultures youth are more valued.
Here are some questions this essay could answer or deal with.
- Where are these cultures in which elderly people are valued? In the city? In Japan? In Yemen? In the huge first-tier cities in China? Among sheep farmers in Scotland?
- Where is the culture of young people valued? In Moscow? In Iran? On the west coast of the US? Among Justin Bieber fans?
- Is it even true that old people are valued anymore worldwide/in your home/in the city/by your friends?
- Is it too simple to say that in Asia older people are valued more than in say America or Spain?
- What would show that younger people are valued? A good school system, as in Finland? Or the use of child labor?
- Do farming societies value young people more than older people?
- How have social changes and the move to the city affected or changed this?
- Do old people have power?
- Do young people have money?
- What does valued mean? It’s a passive, so who is doing the valuing?
- What does it mean for a group to be valued in a society?
Your essay does a good job of comparing old and young people and what they can contribute to society, but that is not what the question asks.
Not answering the question is about the worst thing you can do in IELTS. Have a look at the official descriptors for IELTS Task 2 Writing (public version) here, under Task Response
- Band 5: "addresses the task only partially"
- Band 4: "responds to the task only in a minimal way"
- Band 3: "does not adequately address any part of the task"
Instead of spending time fixing up this essay, try it again. Reply here, bury your introduction (with a silver stake through its heart and lots of garlic, so it never rises up again) and let's see how you do with this tough topic!