Traditional arts civilized a nation. Do you think the government should subsidize musicians, artists, actors or drama companies? What should a government do? Give reasons for answer and include any relevant example from own knowledge or experiences.

Traditional arts are the foundation in a nation whether is painting, drama or any forms of acting. More specifically, traditional arts are the foremost symbol on civilization, which reveals people's life, behavior of living and the prosperity. However, cultivating the local arts should be funded by the government, but how a government support the locals and helps them avoiding vanish.

People's life, belief and even the way they live are connected by the cultural tradition. Therefore, people can experience people's creativity from the exhibition such as developing, drawing, and filming then expend people's vision and outlook. Calligraphy, a Chinese's arts, for example. People become more critical and thoughtful when they calmly writing the calligraphy. Unfortunately, it is rarely show up in this society. Somehow, as those skills and traditional arts have eventually gone, people start to be panic and empty!

Second, to the government, the government can benefit from tourisms that are fascinated by the local customs. More exactly, the long-lasting arts and attraction spots are not only earning money from tourists, but also enhance the country's image in the global communication. Additionally, creating many exhibitions can showcase the local economic clout and vitality and present to tourists the prosperity of the country.

Finally, a government has a huge duty to preserve the cultural heritage and people who is the potential of the creativity. For two strategies that leader can implement improvements. First, the government should allocate money in educating and create the tissue for protecting local arts. In terms of investment, the subsidies should invest in the needy who are unable to explore their talent and ideas.